S. M.
PhD researcher at Stanford University
EB-1A
“Tavana made the case feel operational instead of vague. I could see exactly which parts of my research record were already strong and which pieces needed deeper proof.”
Tavana Immigration
Immigration casework that feels deliberate from the first screen.
Tavana connects shared intake, reusable evidence, case strategy, preparation queues, and review gates in one operating surface built for immigration matters that should never feel improvised.
Profile library
Reusable
One evidence base can serve multiple tracks.
Case strategy
Parallel
Open one path or several before you commit.
Operational control
Visible
Review, release, and preparation states stay explicit.
Operating view
One profile. Several live tracks.
client workspace
Shared profile
Evidence library
Publications, awards, media, patents, speaking, memberships
Baseline intake
Reusable screening before deeper preparation work
Case track
O-1 strategy
in strategy
Preparation signal
Evidence mapped to criteria
Approval state
Waiting on internal review
Preparation queue
Employer and petitioner details
Case-specific intake
Evidence reuse from profile
Attach the strongest existing items
Draft package release
Held until review is complete
Operational signals
The case keeps moving in view.
Profile library is reusable across future filings
Preparation requests stay attached to the correct case
Internal review gates remain visible before release
Workflow
A calm operating model that opens up one step at a time.
Tavana is not trying to replace disciplined casework with a chat window. It is structuring the work so profile facts, preparation needs, and review decisions stay connected. Move across the steps and the current stage expands into view.
Client feedback
Clients respond most strongly to the structure.
The pattern is consistent: clearer strategy, cleaner preparation, and a case process that feels legible instead of improvised.
M. S.
PhD researcher at Harvard University
EB-1A
“The most valuable part was the structure. My publications, citations, and awards were no longer scattered across notes and folders; they became one coherent profile the case could pull from.”
A. G.
Quantitative researcher at Goldman Sachs
EB-1A
“What stood out was the clarity of the strategy layer. Tavana translated a complicated profile into a sequence of concrete decisions instead of generic immigration advice.”
A. Y.
PhD researcher at Columbia University
EB-2 NIW
“The system surfaced the gaps quickly and gave me a clean preparation path. It felt much closer to real casework than a normal intake form.”
S. M.
PhD researcher at Stanford University
EB-1A
“Tavana made the case feel operational instead of vague. I could see exactly which parts of my research record were already strong and which pieces needed deeper proof.”
M. S.
PhD researcher at Harvard University
EB-1A
“The most valuable part was the structure. My publications, citations, and awards were no longer scattered across notes and folders; they became one coherent profile the case could pull from.”
A. G.
Quantitative researcher at Goldman Sachs
EB-1A
“What stood out was the clarity of the strategy layer. Tavana translated a complicated profile into a sequence of concrete decisions instead of generic immigration advice.”
A. Y.
PhD researcher at Columbia University
EB-2 NIW
“The system surfaced the gaps quickly and gave me a clean preparation path. It felt much closer to real casework than a normal intake form.”
S. M.
PhD researcher at Stanford University
EB-1A
“Tavana made the case feel operational instead of vague. I could see exactly which parts of my research record were already strong and which pieces needed deeper proof.”
M. S.
PhD researcher at Harvard University
EB-1A
“The most valuable part was the structure. My publications, citations, and awards were no longer scattered across notes and folders; they became one coherent profile the case could pull from.”
A. G.
Quantitative researcher at Goldman Sachs
EB-1A
“What stood out was the clarity of the strategy layer. Tavana translated a complicated profile into a sequence of concrete decisions instead of generic immigration advice.”
A. Y.
PhD researcher at Columbia University
EB-2 NIW
“The system surfaced the gaps quickly and gave me a clean preparation path. It felt much closer to real casework than a normal intake form.”
Trusted by professionals from
Case types
Built first around the matters where structure changes the outcome most.
The current surface is centered on matters where evidence reuse, case strategy, and lawyer-led preparation matter most. It focuses first on employment-based and extraordinary-ability matters, with adjacent employer-sponsored paths layered in where the workflow fits cleanly.
O-1
Non-immigrantExtraordinary ability matters that need strong evidence packaging, criterion mapping, and petitioner strategy.
Employer or agent-backed
EB-1A
ImmigrantTop-tier profiles with publications, recognition, and achievements that merit a disciplined filing strategy.
Self-petition possible
EB-2 NIW
ImmigrantHigh-impact work framed through national-interest arguments and a reusable professional record.
Self-petition possible
H-1B
Non-immigrantSpecialty occupation workflows that still need cleaner coordination between the employer case and the client record.
Employer-sponsored
Start with structure